True Wireless earphones have only been around a short time
and for the most part, many of the models from the big names have been pretty
hit or miss, and mostly misses – at least from what I could gather. I recently
decided to dive into them as I wanted something that I could use for walking
around, doing activities like physical exercise, yard work, chores, and just
walking to and from the parking lot at work.
I did quite a bit of research into them, but the ones I’ve
been most interested in didn’t seem to get either good review from people I
trust, or just didn’t have the right signature for me. These included models
from Sennheiser, Sony, and Audio Technica, and even ones from Master &
Dynamic, Advanced Sound, and others. But more recently, the AKG-tuned Samsung
Galaxy Buds appeared. At first, I didn’t even bother to look at them. Samsung
headphones? Yeah.
But then I started looking into it more and found out they
decided to tune it using the Harman International research that Dr Sean Olive
et al. performed over the past decade on headphone psychoacoustics and audio
preferences. The Harman Target curve has been developed from a series of tests
over the years to get a preferential sound profile that would attract to a wide
audience. Now, this isn’t the standard sound curve you’ll find in products like
Beats, or Sonys or others that are found in brick and mortar stores, but it’s
somewhat a cross between that type of consumer bass-heavy V-Shape sound and a
more audiophile tuning. The Harman curve, though, isn’t the be-all end-all. In
fact, while I actually do like the general sound tuning, I do like my target
curve to be slightly warmer, more mid-focused and a little easier on the treble
region.
Meanwhile, popular IEM personality Crinacle, started using them and gave me
the thumbs up on them in conversation. I was curious. Really curious – the use
of case of a true wireless in-ear is quite awesome. I could do so many things
while enjoying tunes at the same time and not have to worry about my cable
catching something, getting in the way, and continually manage them as well as
the player. And so, I took a dive into the world of true wireless.
Use Case #1
Daily housework chores – vacuuming, cleaning, cooking,
moving furniture around – all of these are brilliantly easy to do now without
wires in the way. The Galaxy Buds not only performed well sonically in these
activities but also did not ever fall out. Not even when I was moving
bookshelves up and down our house from the third floor to the garage on the
bottom floor. Vacuum noise still was audible, but much more muffled with music
on. Cooking in isolation actually wasn’t as pleasurable as I wanted, mostly
because I do use audible cues to cook food, so turning on the ambient sound mode
did help in this case.
One thing to note is that I am able to leave my phone, the
source, at one corner of my house and perform my tasks without dropping of
connection or any hiccups. Nice to see Bluetooth 5.0 and the Samsung variable
codec at work.
Use Case #2
I have some massively over-grown trees in my backyard. We
have a greenbelt in the back that has a nice little wooded area and
unfortunately this past year has seen the greens grow pretty heavily and
quickly. One of the trees spilled well over our fence line and even touching
our grass, over 12 feet in from fence and 20+ feet wide. I had to chainsaw the
heck out of the branches and feed them through a mulching wood chipper. The
Galaxy buds partnered with me through this exercise, providing enough sound
isolation to not blow my ears from the sound of sawing and chipping, while
giving me fun tunes to rock out to all the while. I never felt like the buds
would fall out and get chipped away into a billion pieces either.
Use Case #3
I sometimes have to park several blocks away from my office
due to limited parking and therefore, the Galaxy Buds come in quite handy. Road
noise is completely eliminated, however if I turn on ambient sound, I can hear
it for safety reasons. Generally, I don’t really have to worry too much about
this though.
Use Case #4
I occasionally take a light rail train into our downtown
area for meetings and, again, the Galaxy Buds did a good job of removing much
of the train and crowd noise on the ride. One other nice things about the
Galaxy Buds is that they are pretty discrete. They do stick out a tad bit from
the side of your ear, but the fit is very comfortable and people may not see
them in.
Use Case #5
Along the same lines, at work, because they are pretty
invisible to a lot of people, I do occasionally get the colleague who thinks
they are talking to me, but I can’t actually hear them. Is that a good thing?
Maybe.
Sounds and Profiles
So, the Galaxy Buds – quite useful for daily activities. And
the sound – they are surprisingly very good! The default tuning is a near
perfect representation of the Harman Target curve, which is pretty enjoyable.
It presents bass with just a tad emphasis but not over-bearing and muddy.
Mid-range is a little recessed, and makes male voices a little thin, and does emphasize
female vocals over males. That said, the treble is airy and maybe a tad hot for
some, but is also wide and spacious.
I found the Galaxy Buds to be on-par with detail resolution,
speed and just general quality as other IEMs in its price range of $129 and
maybe even reaching up to $199 IEMs I’ve reviewed in the past. With the Galaxy
Wearables app, which unfortunately is only available on Android, and not
available on iOS, several EQ profiles can adjust the sound of the buds to your
liking.
The Bass Boost EQ makes the Buds a tad muddy and really
loses a lot of definition, especially if you enjoy upper-mid range presence and
clarity. I am not a fan of it, but it does provide a little more subbass and noticeable
rumble and punch.
The Soft EQ is one of my favorites. It provides some need
warmth and richness to the bass and lower midrange that gives a little more
body to male vocals and the general sound, without losing too much of the upper
mid-range and treble. It does come across as a tad smeared, when compared to
the Etymotics ER2XR, which shares very similar frequency response curve and
sound to this EQ, but the Galaxy Buds has much better treble qualities than the
well-liked ER2XR, which makes the Buds just a little more airy, wide, and versatile.
If you want a direct competitor, than the Moondrop KXXS and the Soft EQ Galaxy
Buds square up quite nicely. The Buds are limited by Bluetooth codec limitations,
however, I find them very similar in sound, tonality, and technicalities with
KXXS winning just slightly in resolution due to being wired.
The Dynamic EQ changes the Buds into a V-shaped IEM with
emphasized bass and treble and drop in the mid-range. This is a more fun
tuning, which is quite comparable to the TFZ No 3, which has recently come out
and quite liked. I found the No 3 to have more slam and clarity, but it’s also
a little brighter and harsher as well.
The Clear EQ setting gives the upper-mid range and treble a
little more emphasis, by dropping some of the mid-bass a bit. This actually
does make sound come out clearer and cleaner, albeit a tad lean sounding. The
stock tuning and the clear EQ tuning remind me of the Moondrop Kansas Pro quite
a bit, to the point where it’s hard to distinguish the two. The Kanas Pro is
just a tad brighter, and has some upper end energy that may be fatiguing to
some, and that also provides a little more air and a slightly wider soundstage.
Finally, the Treble Boost tuning turns the Galaxy Buds from
a Harman tuning to a more traditional Diffuse Field tuning – in this case it’s
comparable to the Etymotics ER series of in-ears. While the Etymotics will beat
out the Galaxy Buds in resolution, detail retrieval, and isolation, the Galaxy
Buds don’t sound that bad. They still have a tad more warmth to them than the
DF-tuning, and actually makes them quite pleasant with the added bass boost
over the normal Etymotics tuning.
Overall
So, I’ve rambled on a bit now, but I have to say, after the
month and half of having these new partners-in-crime, I am just puzzled and
mystified and how great of an overall package these are. They are simple to
use, quick to pair, and just work right. They have great range, and touch
controls that make sense and work. They have an app that has a bunch of
settings and tweaks that make wise changes. And they have the sound that keeps
me interested and entertained. And, most importantly, they fit really well!
Now, I don’t want to pretend these are world-beaters. These
are not going to take down some of the higher end In-Ears in technicalities,
resolution, or just general sound quality, but these can easily go to combat
against the budget world and IEMs, including the crazy price-to-performance
Chinese brands, and come out on top or at least die trying. I have no qualms as
to keeping these and using them as a daily driver alongside my qdc Anole VX.
They are getting equal run-time with me currently and I don’t foresee that
changing until something else comes along.
These have essentially replaced my budget to mid-tier IEMs.
Who knew I’d like Bluetooth IEMs? Who knew I’d like consumer-brand headphones?
Who knew this would come from Samsung of all companies?
I am still surprised every day by these. That’s all. They
are worth $129.
--
View the product ratings on
Antdroid's IEM Ranking List and/or Antdroid's Headphone Ranking List
Dammit I just bought some Sony WH1000 xm3! Might have to reconsider, these have been on my radar but as yourself, they didn't appeal to me so much at first
ReplyDeleteAntdroid, what is this Galaxy buds product code given by Samsung? Sometimes it is difficult to differentiate Samsung product by name.. It is easier to lool for it by code..
ReplyDeleteI have an S9 phone to do the eq on the buds through the app. My question is: If I use my tv as the source, is the eq setting merely resident on the phone or does it stick with the buds? I 'd like to use te app to make tv audio adjustments on the buds.
ReplyDelete